主页 > 国内 >

西西里的美丽传说

知与行|深化“包干制”改革 提高科研投入效能_我的网站

秘密

A |     

China's Ministry of Justice Photo: VCG
China's Ministry of Justice Photo: VCG
China on Wednesday determined that the EU's cross-border investigative practices targeting Chinese entities in its probe into JD.com under the Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR) constituted unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction, and said it is barring organizations and individuals from implementing or assisting with the measures.
This statement was made by China's Ministry of Justice (MOJ), together with the Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) and other relevant departments. The announcement takes effect immediately.
The finding follows an investigation conducted pursuant to Articles 3 and 6 of China's rules on countering foreign states' unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction measures. No organization or individual may implement or assist in implementing such measures, according to the official WeChat account of the MOJ on Wednesday evening. 
The announcement sends a clear and firm message about China's position on the EU's unilateral measures, and the bloc should carefully weigh the broader implications of pursuing such actions, including the potential costs to its own interests and China-EU economic and trade relations, a Chinese expert said. Continued use of the FSR in this manner could erode investment confidence and further strain bilateral economic ties, the expert noted.
Countering extraterritorial overreach
A spokesperson for China's MOJ on Wednesday blasted the EU's targeting of JD.com, saying the bloc had arbitrarily demanded extensive and unnecessary information located in China from Chinese entities on a cross-border basis. Such demands are improper and constitute a serious violation of the international rule of law, the spokesperson said.
To safeguard China's sovereignty, security and development interests, as well as the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese citizens, legal persons and other organizations, the Ministry of Justice, together with the Ministry of Commerce and other relevant authorities, determined in accordance with rules on countering foreign states' unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction measures that the EU's actions constituted unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction. Any organization or individual is therefore prohibited from complying with or assisting in the implementation of the measures, according to the spokesperson.
The MOJ spokesperson urged the EU to immediately correct its wrongful practices, stop abusing the Foreign Subsidies Regulation as an investigative tool, and provide a fair, just and predictable market environment for companies investing and operating in Europe. If the EU persists with such actions, China will take resolute countermeasures in accordance with law, the spokesperson said.
Chinese e-commerce giant JD.com's $2.5 billion bid for German electronics retailer Ceconomy may involve Chinese subsidies, European ‌Union competition regulators claimed, as they opened a full-scale investigation into the deal, Reuters reported on May 28.
The acquisition will allow one of China's largest retailers to expand outside its home market via Ceconomy-owned electronic products retailers MediaMarkt and Saturn, Reuters reported.
The decision by ⁠the European Commission marks its first in-depth probe of a Chinese deal under its so-called FSR.
This marks another time the rules on countering foreign states' unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction measures have been invoked since they took effect in April.
In May, the MOJ, together with MOFCOM and other relevant departments, determined after an investigation that the EU's cross border investigative practices targeting Chinese entities in its investigation into Nuctech under the FSR constituted unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction.
The latest announcement concerning the EU's unilateral move under the FSR once again reflects the Chinese government's firm position on safeguarding national sovereignty, security and legitimate rights and interests, while also representing a clear response to the EU's relevant practices, Jian Junbo, director of the Center for China-Europe Relations at Fudan University's Institute of International Studies, told the Global Times on Wednesday.
"The announcement sends a clear signal to the EU and other countries: China will not accept attempts by any country to use its domestic laws as a basis for exercising unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction over matters within China, particularly when such actions undermine China's sovereign rights and interests," said Jian.
Likewise, China will not accept attempts to unilaterally address economic and trade frictions through so-called legal instruments when doing so harms the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese companies and the Chinese market, Jian said.
Call on fair, just market
The EU's frequent use of the FSR against Chinese companies is not an isolated occurrence.
In February, the European Commission announced an in-depth investigation under the FSR into Chinese wind turbine manufacturer Goldwind.
Responding to the bloc's move, a MOFCOM spokesperson said that the EU had recently frequently used the FSR to launch investigations into Chinese companies and had escalated investigations into Chinese wind power and security equipment companies to in-depth probes, showing clear targeting and discrimination. China has expressed serious concern and strong dissatisfaction over the moves.
The MOFCOM spokesperson said the EU's investigations had broadened the concept of "foreign subsidies" and involved multiple problems, including insufficient evidence to launch investigations and a lack of transparency in procedures, describing the practices as "typical protectionism in the name of 'fair competition.'"
In January 2025, following an investigation, MOFCOM already determined in accordance with the law that the EU's relevant practices constituted trade and investment barriers. Instead of correcting its practices, the EU has gone further down the wrong path.
"China has made its position very clear, and the EU should fully consider the consequences of continuing with such measures, including their potential impact on the EU itself and on China-EU economic and trade relations," Zhang Jian, a vice president of the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations, told the Global Times on Wednesday.
If the EU continues to impose excessive restrictions on foreign companies through similar rules, it will not only raise compliance costs for multinational companies but could also undermine the competitiveness of European businesses, Zhang said, noting that the EU economy is already facing considerable challenges, while concerns over excessive regulation, bureaucracy and increasingly complex rules have also grown within Europe.
Moreover, such rules may ultimately constrain European companies as well as foreign businesses, experts noted. At a time when the EU economy is facing difficulties, adding more regulation and restrictions instead of addressing underlying problems would be akin to "drinking poison to quench thirst," potentially creating even greater problems for the European economy, Zhang said.
China and the EU are both major global economies. Chinese investment in Europe not only brings capital, but also creates jobs, strengthens supply chains, introduces new technologies and adds vitality to local markets, Jian said.
Moreover, from new-energy vehicles to air conditioners and other consumer products, Chinese companies have brought high-quality, cost-effective products to European consumers, helping meet much-needed market demand while providing consumers with greater choice.
Jian said that as China-EU cross border investment deepens, regulatory frictions are inevitable, but they should be addressed through dialogue and coordination rather than unilateral expansion of extraterritorial jurisdiction. Respect for each other's judicial sovereignty and legal boundaries is essential to stable and predictable economic and trade ties, the expert said.
。    加快推进高水平科技自立自强,不仅要加大科研资金支持力度,还要以机制创新提高科研投入效能,把宝贵的资金花在“刀刃”上。习近平总书记强调:“各级各有关方面要完善制度机制,改进管理办法,确保真金白银既投到位、更用得好,实现投入规模增加与效能提升的统一。

B | ”实行财政科研项目经费“包干制”,是遵循科研规律,破除创新堵点、释放创新活力的重要举措。我省“十五五”规划纲要提出,探索经费使用松绑政策,扩大财政科研项目经费“包干制”范围,建立健全稳定性支持和竞争性支持相结合的财政科技投入机制。财政科研项目经费“包干制”是优化科研管理的重要制度创新。要进一步完善现代科研治理体系,用好这一制度创新,提高科技创新投入效能,强化高质量发展的科技支撑。拓宽改革覆盖领域。分类型、分阶段扩大财政科研项目经费“包干制”范围,推动其向一般性、普惠性科研项目延伸。完善项目管理细则,合理下放经费支配、科研攻关自主权限。根据基础研究周期长、耗资大的特点,建立长周期稳定资助机制,持续保障创新资金投入,让科研人员安心开展原创性研究。提升数字化服务能力。依托省级科创数字化平台做优线上政务服务,打通财政、科技、审计等部门数据通道,集成经费报销、决算审核、风险预警等线上功能。依托数字化平台实现项目申报、验收线上办理,为科研松绑、为创新减负,减少科研人员不必要的事务性工作,让他们把主要精力投入科技创新和研发活动中,充分释放人才创新活力。构建分层分类治理体系。坚持放权赋能与精准监管并重,依托科研信用分级实施差异化监管,形成事前精简审核、事中动态管控、事后公开监督的管理模式。

C | 深化科技评价改革,强化创新能力、质量、实效、贡献导向,构建适配财政科研项目经费“包干制”的专属评价体系,开展分类评价。强化绩效梯度联动运用,以绩效奖惩机制优化科创资源配置。全面落实科研诚信承诺制度,压实项目负责人责任,建立多部门联动监管机制。营造开放包容、宽容失败的创新环境,制定科学精准、清晰规范、可量化验证的尽职免责认定标准与实施细则。压实科研院所主体责任,细化配套细则,配齐配强科研财务力量。强化政策协同。加强政策实操培训,立足不同岗位履职需求分群体制定差异化培训内容,避免政策认知与执行偏差。统一全省经费审计、结题审核标准,消除落地执行差异。借力京津冀科创协同,畅通跨区域成果转化通道,推动财政科创资金精准赋能产业发展。构建减负增效、规范有序、活力充沛的现代化科研经费管理体系,以高效能科创治理、高水平科技研发为高质量发展注入强劲动力。(作者:李海燕 单位:师范大学)。

Current article:http://wwse7us.zanjionglangzhaizhizaxiying.buzz/list_zq4/49r.html

Published on:08:29:21


相关文章
推荐图文
最热文章